GBP Specialist
Review Response
SOP-04: GBP Review Monitoring & Response Management
Section titled “SOP-04: GBP Review Monitoring & Response Management”Last Updated: 2026-04-16
Owner: GBP Specialist
Status: Active (manual fallback) - Primary workflow is now Clawton-driven, see review-response-clawton-workflow.md
IMPORTANT: Workflow Change as of 2026-04-16
Section titled “IMPORTANT: Workflow Change as of 2026-04-16”For 4-5 star reviews, the PRIMARY workflow is now review-response-clawton-workflow.md. Clawton (the agent on the VPS) automatically detects new reviews every 4 hours, drafts personalized responses in the owner’s voice, and sends them to Edward in TaskTracker chat for approval.
This SOP remains the manual fallback for these situations:
- Clawton is down or not sending messages for over 8 hours
- A specific client is missing from the agent’s roster
- An urgent response is needed faster than the next cron cycle (under 4 hours)
- 1-3 star reviews still follow the escalation path defined here (Sections 4 and 5)
For day-to-day work, follow review-response-clawton-workflow.md. Use this document for fallback execution and for the templates, fake review handling, and escalation rules that still apply universally.
Overview
Section titled “Overview”This SOP covers the daily monitoring, response, and management of Google Business Profile reviews. Reviews are critical for trust, credibility, and local search rankings. The GBP Specialist is responsible for responding to 100% of reviews (positive, negative, and neutral) within defined SLAs, maintaining brand voice consistency, personalizing responses, and escalating high-risk situations to the CSM.
Key Inputs:
- Search Atlas for review monitoring and response publishing
- Task Tracker for all documentation and escalations
- 13-ai-prompt-library.md for response templates
- Client brand guidelines (for tone and voice)
Escalation Path: GBP Specialist → CSM → Ops Lead → Nick
SECTION 1: DAILY REVIEW MONITORING WORKFLOW
Section titled “SECTION 1: DAILY REVIEW MONITORING WORKFLOW”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”Every business day, start of day (part of morning routine)
GBP Specialist
Daily Monitoring Process
Section titled “Daily Monitoring Process”Step 1: Log into Search Atlas
- Launch Search Atlas
- Navigate to all client profiles (or use filtering to show only active clients with GBP)
Step 2: Check for Alerts & New Reviews
- Search Atlas review alerts: Check for email notifications from Search Atlas about new reviews
- GBP section in Search Atlas: Review “Inbox” or “Reviews” tab for each client
- Flag immediately: Any negative (1-3 star) reviews for same-day response
- Flag immediately: Any reviews mentioning specific customer names (personalization opportunity)
- Flag for escalation: Any reviews that appear fake, spam, or defamatory
Step 3: Scan Previous Day’s Responses
- Check if any client responded to yesterday’s reviews (client sometimes responds directly to GBP)
- If client beat us to it: Note in Task Tracker, no further action needed
- If response quality is poor (generic, off-brand): Do not override; document for future training
Step 4: Identify Response Priority
- High priority (respond today):
- All negative reviews (1-3 stars)
- All reviews with 5 stars and detailed feedback (quick win for engagement)
- All reviews mentioning problems (service failure, late delivery, quality issue)
- Normal priority (respond within 24 hours):
- 4-star reviews
- 5-star generic reviews (e.g., “Great service!”)
- Neutral reviews
Step 5: Document in Task Tracker
- Create task entry: “[CLIENT] — Review Response Required”
- Log: Date, reviewer name, rating, review text, response priority
- Format example: “2026-03-31 — John D. — 5 stars — ‘Best plumber ever!’ — Normal priority”
Morning Routine Timeframe
Section titled “Morning Routine Timeframe”- Time allocation: 30-45 minutes for all clients
- Deadline: Complete monitoring by 10am
- Frequency: Every workday (Monday-Friday)
- Weekend/Holiday: Reviews still monitored (use delayed batch on next business day)
Search Atlas Review Tab Navigation (Reference)
Section titled “Search Atlas Review Tab Navigation (Reference)”- If Search Atlas interface varies, use these general navigation rules:
- Look for “Reviews” section or “Inbox” in main menu
- Click to see all reviews (sorted by date, newest first)
- Reviews should show: Star rating, reviewer name, review text, date posted, response status
- Click individual review to compose response
SECTION 2: RESPONSE SLAs & PRIORITIZATION
Section titled “SECTION 2: RESPONSE SLAs & PRIORITIZATION”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”New review appears in GBP
GBP Specialist
Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
Section titled “Service Level Agreements (SLAs)”Positive & Neutral Reviews (4-5 stars):
- SLA: Respond within 24 hours
- Target: Respond same day if possible (boost engagement)
- Exception: Weekend reviews can batch-respond Monday morning
- KPI: 100% response rate within 24 hours
Negative Reviews (1-3 stars):
- SLA: Respond within 4-6 hours (same business day)
- Target: Respond within 2 hours of discovery
- Exception: After-hours reviews (after 6pm) respond first thing next morning
- KPI: 100% response rate same-day, 90%+ within 2 hours of discovery
False/Defamatory Reviews:
- SLA: Flag to CSM immediately (same hour)
- Escalation required: Do not respond publicly
- GBP flagging process: See Section 4 (Fake Review Handling)
Priority Matrix
Section titled “Priority Matrix”| Review Type | Stars | Urgency | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (problem mentioned) | 1-3 | URGENT | Within 2 hours |
| Negative (vague complaint) | 1-3 | HIGH | Within 4-6 hours same day |
| Neutral (mixed feedback) | 3-4 | MEDIUM | Within 24 hours |
| Positive (specific praise) | 5 | MEDIUM | Within 24 hours (but reply same day if possible) |
| Positive (generic brief) | 5 | LOW | Within 24-48 hours |
Implementation: Use Task Tracker to categorize by priority; batch-respond starting with URGENT, then HIGH, then MEDIUM.
SECTION 3: RESPONSE TEMPLATES & PERSONALIZATION FRAMEWORK
Section titled “SECTION 3: RESPONSE TEMPLATES & PERSONALIZATION FRAMEWORK”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”Any review requiring response
GBP Specialist
Template Structure
Section titled “Template Structure”All responses follow this framework: Opening + Specific Acknowledge + Action/Invitation + Closing
Character limits: Google GBP responses typically allow 5,000 characters; keep responses 100-300 characters (brief, punchy, scannable)
POSITIVE RESPONSE TEMPLATES (3 Variations)
Section titled “POSITIVE RESPONSE TEMPLATES (3 Variations)”Variation 1: Enthusiastic & Personal
- Use for: 5-star reviews with specific praise
- When: Customer names a service, employee, or specific outcome
- Template:
"[Name], thank you so much! We loved working with you on [specific work].That's exactly the kind of result we're proud of. Looking forward tohelping you again soon!"Variation 2: Grateful & Professional
- Use for: 5-star reviews from first-time customers
- When: Review is detailed but doesn’t require personalization
- Template:
"We appreciate your kind words! Your satisfaction is what drives us.We'd love to help you again — just give us a call!"Variation 3: Brief & Warm
- Use for: 5-star generic reviews, quick acknowledgment needed
- When: Review is short (“Great service!”)
- Template:
"Thank you for choosing us! We're grateful for your trust."Positive Response Checklist:
- ✅ Reviewer name used (if provided in review)
- ✅ Reference specific service/detail mentioned (if applicable)
- ✅ Tone matches client’s brand voice
- ✅ Invitation to return or next action (booking, calling, etc.)
- ✅ 100-300 characters
- ✅ No generic copy-paste feel (customize every response)
Examples by Industry:
Plumbing (Positive):
“Thanks for the 5 stars, David! We’re glad we could get your water heater fixed quickly. Call us anytime for your plumbing needs!”
Landscaping (Positive):
“Sarah, your yard looks amazing! We had fun working on your spring cleanup. Let’s keep it looking beautiful. See you soon!”
Salon (Positive):
“Michelle, so happy you loved your cut and color! Ask for [Stylist Name] next time — she’d love to see you again!”
NEGATIVE RESPONSE TEMPLATES (3 Variations)
Section titled “NEGATIVE RESPONSE TEMPLATES (3 Variations)”Variation 1: Empathetic & Resolution-Focused
- Use for: Specific complaint (quality issue, late delivery, staff concern)
- When: Problem is clear and actionable
- Template:
"[Name], we're sorry to hear about [specific issue]. That's not theexperience we aim for. Please call us at [PHONE] — we'd like to makethis right."Variation 2: Acknowledge & Invite Offline Conversation
- Use for: Unclear issue or emotional complaint
- When: Review is vague or highly negative
- Template:
"We appreciate your feedback and sincerely apologize for your experience.We'd like to understand better and make this right. Please reach out to[MANAGER NAME] at [PHONE]."Variation 3: Professional & Gracious (High-Risk Situation)
- Use for: Defamatory or legally risky review
- When: Contains accusations, threats, or false claims
- Template (then escalate to CSM):
"We take feedback seriously. We'd welcome the chance to discuss thisprivately. Please contact [MANAGER] at [PHONE] to work toward a resolution."Negative Response Checklist:
- ✅ Do NOT be defensive or blame customer
- ✅ Do NOT dismiss the issue (“You’re wrong” or “That’s not true”)
- ✅ Do NOT over-explain or justify
- ✅ DO acknowledge emotion (“We’re sorry,” “We understand”)
- ✅ DO offer resolution path (phone call, in-person discussion)
- ✅ DO invite private conversation (away from public review platform)
- ✅ Include specific phone number and ideally manager name
- ✅ Keep response brief (don’t over-apologize)
- ✅ Professional tone, even if reviewer is angry
Examples by Industry:
Plumbing (Negative):
“We’re sorry your experience wasn’t what you expected. We’d like to make it right. Please call our manager, Tom, at (555) 123-4567.”
Landscaping (Negative):
“Thank you for sharing this feedback. We’re committed to quality work. Please reach out to us directly at [PHONE] so we can address your concerns.”
Salon (Negative):
“We’re sorry your visit didn’t meet expectations. We’d love a chance to understand what happened and make this right. Please call us at [PHONE].”
NEUTRAL/MIXED RESPONSE TEMPLATE
Section titled “NEUTRAL/MIXED RESPONSE TEMPLATE”Variation: Grateful with Slight Clarification (if needed)
- Use for: 3-4 star reviews or mixed feedback
- When: Reviewer had some positive and some negative experience
- Template:
"Thank you for taking the time to review us. We're glad [positive part].We'd love to discuss [concern area] — please reach out when you have a moment."Example:
“Thanks for the feedback! We’re glad you liked our staff. We’d love to understand the scheduling issue you mentioned. Please call us — we’d like to help.”
PERSONALIZATION RULES
Section titled “PERSONALIZATION RULES”Every response must include at least one of the following to avoid generic feel:
- Reviewer name (if provided in review)
- Specific service mentioned (e.g., “your kitchen remodel” not just “work”)
- Specific employee name (if customer praised someone by name)
- Specific outcome or detail (e.g., “got your water heater working same-day”)
- Reference to their exact concern (for negatives; show you read the review carefully)
Anti-Patterns (Never Use):
- ❌ Generic thank you with no personalization
- ❌ Copy-paste identical responses to multiple reviews
- ❌ Reviewer says “John was helpful,” you respond “Thanks for working with us” (missed opportunity)
- ❌ Response that sounds corporate/automated
- ❌ Response longer than 300 characters (too wordy)
SECTION 4: FAKE & SPAM REVIEW IDENTIFICATION & FLAGGING
Section titled “SECTION 4: FAKE & SPAM REVIEW IDENTIFICATION & FLAGGING”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”Review appears suspicious during daily monitoring
GBP Specialist
Red Flags for Fake/Spam Reviews
Section titled “Red Flags for Fake/Spam Reviews”Competitor Reviews (Most Common):
- Negative review from competitor or competitor staff
- Vague negative complaint with no specific detail
- Multiple 1-star reviews from same general area within short timeframe
- Review contains competitor’s name (“I prefer [Competitor] instead”)
Spam/Inappropriate Content:
- Review contains profanity, threats, or hate speech
- Review is about something completely unrelated to business (political rants, personal drama)
- Review is trying to get clicks/promotion (spam link or promotional message)
False/Defamatory:
- Review makes specific false claims (“They overcharged me $1,000” but no context)
- Review contains discriminatory language
- Review accuses of illegal activity
- Review threatens legal action or public shaming
- Multiple reviews with identical wording (coordinated attack)
Suspicious Patterns:
- Reviewer has only 1 review ever, and it’s a 1-star for this business
- Reviewer account created same day as review
- Reviewer name is obviously fake (“John ZZZZZ” or “A. B.”)
Google Flagging Process
Section titled “Google Flagging Process”Step 1: Identify the Review as Problematic
- Note in Task Tracker: “[CLIENT] — Suspicious Review — [Reviewer Name] — [Reason]”
- Example: “Landscaping Corp — Suspicious Review — ‘John Smith’ — Defamatory, accuses of theft with no context”
Step 2: Document Evidence
- Screenshot the review with date/time visible
- Save to
/client-files/[CLIENT]/Reviews/Flagged/ - Note why you believe it’s fake: competitor mention, false claim, spam pattern, etc.
Step 3: Flag in Google Business Profile (GBP)
- Log into GBP directly (or through Search Atlas)
- Find the review in question
- Click “Flag as inappropriate” (usually 3-dot menu on review)
- Reason selection:
- “It’s spam” — for spam/competitor reviews
- “It’s inappropriate” — for hate speech, profanity, threats
- “It violates Google’s policies” — for defamatory or false claims
- Do NOT respond publicly to the review
Step 4: Escalate to CSM
- Send Task Tracker message to CSM immediately:
- “Flagged suspicious review for [CLIENT] — [Reason]. See screenshot. Recommend we reach out to discuss.”
- Attach screenshot
- CSM will decide if client should be informed and/or if legal action is needed
Step 5: No Public Response
- Do NOT respond to flagged reviews in GBP (makes them more visible)
- Only Google can remove reviews; our flagging requests are queued for review
- Google typically removes clear policy violations within 48 hours
- Competitor reviews sometimes take longer (requires clear evidence of same person/business)
What NOT to Do
Section titled “What NOT to Do”- ❌ Do NOT respond publicly defending yourself (escalates the situation)
- ❌ Do NOT ask reviewer to remove review (can appear retaliatory)
- ❌ Do NOT flag every negative review as spam (wastes credibility)
- ❌ Do NOT assume a negative review is fake just because it hurts (require evidence)
- ❌ Do NOT flag to Google multiple times (one per review is enough)
SECTION 5: ESCALATION PROTOCOL
Section titled “SECTION 5: ESCALATION PROTOCOL”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”Review requires escalation beyond standard response
GBP Specialist (identifies), CSM (handles escalation)
Escalation Scenarios
Section titled “Escalation Scenarios”| Scenario | Action | Timeline | Who Escalates | Who Handles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defamatory/False claim | Flag in GBP immediately; notify CSM | Same hour | GBP Specialist | CSM (evaluate legal risk) |
| Threat in review | Flag in GBP; escalate to CSM; do not respond | Same hour | GBP Specialist | CSM |
| 1-star review indicating real problem | Respond with resolution offer; flag for CSM review | Same day | GBP Specialist | GBP Specialist + CSM (client contact) |
| Multiple negative reviews in 48 hours | Document pattern; notify CSM | Same day | GBP Specialist | CSM (client communication) |
| Customer requests review removal | Do NOT remove; explain Google policy to client via CSM | Within 24 hours | Client via CSM | CSM |
| Fake profile review (impersonation) | Flag in GBP; document; escalate | Same day | GBP Specialist | CSM (legal decision) |
CSM Notification Template
Section titled “CSM Notification Template”Task Tracker Message Example:
[CLIENT NAME] — Escalation: Negative Review Requiring Response Strategy
Review: 1-star from Sarah M., posted [DATE]"Worst experience ever. Showed up 2 hours late and charged extra."
Issue: Indicates real service failure (late arrival, surprise charges)Action taken: Flagged for CSM contact with client
Recommendation: Client should be informed and offered resolution directly(we can respond in GBP offering to discuss, but CSM should reach outto understand client's side first).
Screenshot attached. Awaiting guidance.SECTION 6: MONTHLY REVIEW PERFORMANCE TRACKING
Section titled “SECTION 6: MONTHLY REVIEW PERFORMANCE TRACKING”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”By 20th of each month
GBP Specialist
Monthly Review Metrics to Track
Section titled “Monthly Review Metrics to Track”Core Metrics:
| Metric | Source | Track | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review Count | Search Atlas | Total new reviews this month | Volume tracking |
| Average Rating | Search Atlas | Star average across all reviews | Trend analysis |
| Rating Distribution | Search Atlas | Count: 5-star, 4-star, 3-star, 2-star, 1-star | Quality assessment |
| Response Rate | Manual tracking in Task Tracker | % of reviews responded to | Compliance KPI |
| Response Time | Manual (Task Tracker logs) | Average hours to respond | SLA compliance |
| Trend | Month-over-month comparison | Up/down/stable | Improvement tracking |
Monthly Review Report Creation
Section titled “Monthly Review Report Creation”By 20th of each month, create Task Tracker report:
[CLIENT NAME] — Monthly Review Summary — [MONTH/YEAR]
NUMBERS:- New reviews this month: [#]- Response rate: [#]% (100% target)- Average response time (positive): [X] hours- Average response time (negative): [X] hours- Average rating: [X]/5
RATING BREAKDOWN:- 5-star: [#] reviews- 4-star: [#] reviews- 3-star: [#] reviews- 2-star: [#] reviews- 1-star: [#] reviews
TREND (vs. last month):- Review volume: ↑ / ↓ / → [by X%]- Average rating: ↑ / ↓ / → [from X to X]
NOTABLE REVIEWS:- Highest praise: [Reviewer + quote]- Lowest rating: [Reviewer + issue]- Escalations: [Any flagged reviews, fake reviews, etc.]
INSIGHTS:- [1-2 sentences on trends observed]
NEXT MONTH FOCUS:- [Any adjustments needed in review response strategy]KPI Targets for Monthly Review
Section titled “KPI Targets for Monthly Review”| KPI | Target | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Review response rate | 100% of reviews answered | Monthly |
| Positive review response time | Within 24 hours, 80%+ same-day | Monthly |
| Negative review response time | Within 4-6 hours same-day | Monthly |
| Average rating stability | Maintain or improve month-over-month | Monthly |
| Review volume | Trending up (more reviews = more visibility) | Monthly |
| Escalation handling | All escalations flagged and documented | Monthly |
| Zero generic responses | Personalization in 100% of responses | Monthly |
SECTION 7: COMMUNICATION & TASK TRACKER LOGGING
Section titled “SECTION 7: COMMUNICATION & TASK TRACKER LOGGING”Trigger
Section titled “Trigger”Every review response or escalation event
GBP Specialist
Task Tracker Documentation Standard
Section titled “Task Tracker Documentation Standard”Every response must be logged in Task Tracker with:
- Client name
- Review date (when posted)
- Reviewer name (if provided)
- Star rating (1-5)
- Response date (when we responded)
- Response time (hours between review and our response)
- Response text (full response copied)
- Escalation flag (Y/N and reason if Y)
Format example:
[CLIENT] Review Response Log — March 2026
2026-03-28 | David S. | 5-star | "Great service!"Response posted: 2026-03-28 (same day)Response: "David, thanks so much! We're grateful for your trust."Status: Complete | No escalation
2026-03-29 | Sarah M. | 1-star | "Showed up late, overcharged"Response posted: 2026-03-29 (same day, 4 hours)Response: "Sarah, we're sorry to hear. Let's make this right — call [MANAGER] at [PHONE]"Status: Complete | Escalated to CSM (real service issue)Monthly Logs
Section titled “Monthly Logs”- Keep running log in Task Tracker for each client
- At end of month, archive monthly log and start fresh
- Save completed logs to
/client-files/[CLIENT]/Reviews/[MONTH-YEAR]-Log.txt
SECTION 8: QC CHECKLIST FOR EVERY RESPONSE
Section titled “SECTION 8: QC CHECKLIST FOR EVERY RESPONSE”Before publishing any review response in GBP, verify:
- ✅ Reviewer name used (if provided in review)
- ✅ Specific detail referenced (service name, outcome, or specific issue)
- ✅ Tone appropriate (empathetic for negative, grateful for positive)
- ✅ No defensive language (not blaming or justifying, especially for negatives)
- ✅ Call-to-action clear (what should reviewer do next? Call, visit, book?)
- ✅ Phone number included (for negative reviews, include contact phone)
- ✅ Under 300 characters (brief, scannable, not over-wordy)
- ✅ Spelling & grammar perfect (zero errors)
- ✅ Not copy-paste (unique response, not identical to previous response)
- ✅ Brand voice matches (client’s tone and terminology used)
- ✅ Not generic (avoids “Thanks for your business” without personalization)
- ✅ Emotion appropriate (doesn’t over-apologize or under-acknowledge)
- ✅ Fake review flagged (if applicable, flagged in GBP before attempting response)
If any item fails QC: Do NOT publish. Rewrite and re-check.
DAILY CHECKLIST & TIME ALLOCATION
Section titled “DAILY CHECKLIST & TIME ALLOCATION”Every Workday Morning (8:00-10:00 AM):
- ✅ Log into Search Atlas
- ✅ Check all clients for new reviews
- ✅ Scan for high-priority negatives (flag for urgent response)
- ✅ Identify fake/spam (flag for escalation)
- ✅ Document new reviews in Task Tracker
- ✅ Prioritize response queue
Throughout Day (10:00 AM - 4:00 PM):
- ✅ Respond to negative reviews (highest priority first)
- ✅ Respond to positive reviews (personalized, not generic)
- ✅ Log each response in Task Tracker
- ✅ Escalate defamatory/fake reviews to CSM
End of Day (4:00-5:00 PM):
- ✅ Verify all responses published in GBP
- ✅ Screenshot any escalations
- ✅ Update Task Tracker with day’s completion status
- ✅ Flag any unresolved reviews for next day
By 20th of Each Month:
- ✅ Compile monthly review summary
- ✅ Document KPIs in Task Tracker
- ✅ Share report with CSM
RELATED DOCUMENTATION
Section titled “RELATED DOCUMENTATION”- 01-role-gbp-specialist.md — Full GBP Specialist role overview
- 02-sop-gbp-management.md — GBP setup and profile optimization
- 13-ai-prompt-library.md — Review response template library and framework
- 00-client-lifecycle-playbook.md — Review Generation Guide for clients (P0 phase)
Performance KPIs
Section titled “Performance KPIs”| KPI | Target | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review response rate (all reviews) | 100% responded to | Weekly | GBP Specialist |
| Positive review response time | Within 24 hours, 80%+ same-day | Weekly | GBP Specialist |
| Negative review response time | Within 4-6 hours, 100% same-day | Weekly | GBP Specialist |
| Zero generic responses | 100% personalized | Monthly | GBP Specialist |
| Escalation accuracy | Correct scenarios escalated, false positives minimized | Monthly | GBP Specialist |
| Fake review flagging accuracy | Correctly identify 95%+ of spam | Monthly | GBP Specialist |
| Task Tracker logging | 100% of responses documented | Weekly | GBP Specialist |
| SLA adherence | 100% compliance to response timeframes | Monthly | GBP Specialist |
Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-31 Owner: GBP Specialist Next Review: 2026-06-30